Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #6802

open

Split Mentat specific keys and enrichment keys namespaces

Added by Pavel Kácha over 3 years ago. Updated 12 months ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Target version:
Start date:
11/19/2020
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
To be discussed:
No

Description

Historically we save Mentat specific keys (abuse contacts, classes, enrichments, ...) within _CESNET namespace in Idea. While it makes sense to store Mentat related metadata in its own namespace, we should split out enrichments (GeoIP, DNS, PassiveDNS, ...) into more fitting place within Idea events.


Related issues

Related to Mentat - Feature #4231: Implement and make use of cleanup mechanism for "_" namespaces from IDEA messages.ClosedRajmund Hruška07/27/2018

Actions
Actions #2

Updated by Pavel Kácha over 3 years ago

  • Related to Feature #4231: Implement and make use of cleanup mechanism for "_" namespaces from IDEA messages. added
Actions #3

Updated by Pavel Kácha about 3 years ago

  • Assignee deleted (Jan Mach)
Actions #4

Updated by Rajmund Hruška 12 months ago

We never needed this feature. We can reopen this issue if we change our minds.

Pavel Kácha can you make this issue rejected? It says that this issue is blocked by at least one open issue, but I can't see any blocking issues. My guess is that that issue is from a project which I don't have permission to view.

Actions #5

Updated by Pavel Kácha 12 months ago

Rajmund Hruška wrote in #note-4:

Pavel Kácha can you make this issue rejected? It says that this issue is blocked by at least one open issue, but I can't see any blocking issues. My guess is that that issue is from a project which I don't have permission to view.

Does not seem so, the only related issue I see is #4231 (already closed).

Actions #6

Updated by Rajmund Hruška 12 months ago

Pavel Kácha wrote in #note-5:

Rajmund Hruška wrote in #note-4:

Pavel Kácha can you make this issue rejected? It says that this issue is blocked by at least one open issue, but I can't see any blocking issues. My guess is that that issue is from a project which I don't have permission to view.

Does not seem so, the only related issue I see is #4231 (already closed).

Oh, I thought it might be because of #6801, which I can't see.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF